Is There a Link Between Blue-Green Algae and Stem Cell Activation?

It looks like algae. It grows like algae. And for centuries, it’s been used as if it were algae.

But blue-green algae, as it's commonly known, isn’t algae at all. It’s something else entirely.

They’re cyanobacteria: sun-powered microorganisms that predate complex life. Long before plants appeared on Earth, they were busy reshaping the atmosphere and pioneering the process of photosynthesis.

These ancient organisms still thrive in wild aquatic ecosystems. But in recent years, they’ve found a foothold in the world of nutritional science. Among them, one strain has emerged in early research for a property that sets it apart: its apparent ability to support stem cell mobilization.*

That strain is Aphanizomenon flos-aquae (AFA), a species of wild cyanobacteria harvested from Oregon’s Upper Klamath Lake. Exposed to intense sunlight, wild temperature swings, and element-dense waters drawn from ancient volcanic soils, it has evolved a complex chemistry built for survival — and potentially for regeneration.

In this article, we’ll explore what blue-green algae really is, how AFA differs from better-known species like spirulina, and how its unique biochemical profile may support the body’s natural regenerative systems.*

What is cyanobacteria?

Cyanobacteria are microscopic, single-celled organisms that live in water and harvest energy from sunlight through photosynthesis.

They’ve existed for over 2.5 billion years, and were responsible for Earth’s first major oxygen surge, reshaping the planet’s atmosphere and making aerobic life possible [1]. 

For that reason, they've been characterized as "sunlight-driven microcellular factories" — ancient engines of transformation that helped breathe life into the breathable world we know today [2].

Is cyanobacteria a plant or a bacteria?

Despite their behavior, cyanobacteria are indeed bacteria. Specifically, they are prokaryotes, which means their cells lack a nucleus and internal organelles. Plants, by contrast, are eukaryotes, with compartmentalized cells that contain specialized structures like mitochondria and a central nucleus.

In some respects, cyanobacteria live between these two worlds. They capture energy from sunlight like plants, but all the processing happens inside a minimalist bacterial frame. Even more curiously, their cell membranes can accumulate the resulting carbon as glycogen — a fast-access energy reserve normally associated with animals [3]. 

So, in both form and function, they straddle evolutionary lines. That fluidity may be key to their survival across billions of years and in challenging environments.

Why is it called blue-green algae?

The term blue-green algae is a historical artifact. 

Before scientists had genetic tools, organisms were grouped mostly by their appearance. Cyanobacteria looked a lot like algae, so they got lumped in together.

The name stuck, even though they’re genetically and structurally very different from true algae.

(The name cyanobacteria, by the way, comes from the Ancient Greek kyanos, meaning “dark blue,” a nod to the distinctive blue-green hue produced by the green of chlorophyll and the blue of phycocyanin.)

How does cyanobacteria differ from algae?

Though they share a watery habitat and a sun-powered lifestyle, cyanobacteria and algae come from entirely different evolutionary lineages.

Algae are eukaryotic — genetically closer to plants (and even animals) than to bacteria. Cyanobacteria, by contrast, belong to an ancient prokaryotic lineage that predates multicellular life. Some cyanobacteria can even produce hydrogen gas, a metabolic trait that hints at their origins in Earth’s primordial environment, long before oxygen was abundant.

Remarkably, they may have taught algae how to photosynthesize. Billions of years ago, a cyanobacterium was engulfed by a primitive eukaryote. Instead of being digested, it stuck around — becoming the chloroplast, the light-harvesting structure found in all plants and algae today [4].

So, while cyanobacteria aren’t algae, they’re arguably the reason algae (and plants) exist as we know them.

What is the difference between spirulina and blue-green algae?

“Blue-green algae” is a catchall term for various species of cyanobacteria. At a glance, they might seem nearly identical — free-floating, green-tinted, and prolific in freshwater ecosystems. But the species grouped under that label can differ dramatically in how they grow, as well as how they function in the body.

Spirulina is one of the most familiar examples. More precisely, it’s the common name for a cyanobacterium now classified as Limnospira platensis and Limnospira maxima (formerly A. platensis and A. maxima respectively), cultivated worldwide for its nutritional density and antioxidant content. It thrives in warm, alkaline ponds — often under carefully controlled conditions designed to ensure consistency and yield [5].

So, all spirulina is blue-green algae, but not all blue-green algae is spirulina.

Aphanizomenon flos-aquae (AFA) is another member of this group. But unlike Spirulina, it grows wild in the waters of Oregon’s Klamath Lake. This untamed environment fosters a distinct biochemical profile [6].

While it shares some nutritional attributes with its better-known cousins, AFA brings something different to the table: a blend of neuroactive compounds, immune-modulating molecules, and regenerative potential that’s distinct among microalgae.*

What Makes AFA Unique? A Blueprint for Resilience

Long before it entered a capsule, Aphanizomenon flos-aquae spent eons adapting to one of the harshest freshwater environments in North America. 

It grows in Upper Klamath Lake, a high-altitude basin where extremes collide [2]. 

At over 4,000 feet above sea level, the lake is shallow and windswept, caught between elemental opposites. Each year, glacial runoff chills its waters from above, while geothermal springs heat them from below. Its floor is layered with volcanic sediment — an ancient imprint of fire — while the surface endures unfiltered high-altitude sun [7]. 

This is no easy habitat. But that’s exactly the point.

Just as wild berries contain more polyphenols than their cultivated cousins (because they’ve had to fend for themselves) [8], AFA’s harsh environment has pushed it to develop a broad arsenal of protective compounds. Over time, its chemistry became a reflection of the extremes it endures. 

When we consume AFA, we are absorbing the biochemical strategies of an organism that knows how to thrive under pressure, and putting them to work in our own internal environment.*

What’s Inside: AFA’s Bioactive Chemistry

Some compounds make their presence known immediately. Phycocyanin is one of them. It is the brilliant blue pigment that defines AFA visually, and does far more beneath the surface [9].

In AFA, phycocyanin acts as a built-in defense system, helping the organism manage oxidative stress from unrelenting sun exposure at high altitude [10]. That protective chemistry carries forward when we consume it. In the human body, it acts as a potent antioxidant — supporting cellular protection, modulating enzyme activity, and helping maintain balance in tissues under stress.* 

Importantly, phycocyanin may function differently when it remains part of the full matrix of the blue-green algae. 

When scientists compare isolated phycocyanin to whole-AFA extracts, the full-spectrum form has been shown to deliver greater antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. [11]* That suggests it’s not acting alone — and that the surrounding compounds in AFA enhance, stabilize, or modulate its activity in meaningful ways. It’s a reminder that nature often works best in context, and that the power of AFA lies not in its individual parts, but in how they work together.

And that’s just what’s on the surface. Beneath the visible pigment lies a deeper layer of complexity.

Another standout in AFA’s profile is β-phenylethylamine (PEA). Sometimes referred to as the “feel-good molecule,” PEA is produced by the body in small amounts during moments of elevated arousal — like intense focus or exercise [12]. It plays a role in regulating neurotransmitters like dopamine and norepinephrine, and is associated with mood, motivation, and mental clarity.*

PEA is also one of the compounds thought to contribute to the phenomenon known as “runner’s high”—the euphoric, clear-headed state many people experience during sustained aerobic activity [13].* 

But for all its power, PEA is notoriously short-lived. Once produced, it’s rapidly broken down by enzymes, often within just a few minutes.* That’s part of why PEA remains largely under the radar; the signal vanishes almost as quickly as it arrives.

Here is where AFA gets even more interesting. AFA does more than just produce PEA — it protects it. 

The phycocyanin in AFA, as well as mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs), have been shown in vitro to inhibit the enzymes involved with its breakdown in the body [11]. This may help preserve PEA’s activity, extending its lifespan in the body and allowing it to more fully support mental clarity and emotional resilience.*

Finally, AFA also contains polysaccharides, or long-chain carbohydrates, some of which are modified into glycopeptides or sulfated polysaccharides. These structures can influence how immune cells communicate and respond to their environment [14].

In one human study, participants who consumed AFA experienced a rapid increase in circulating immune cells — including helper T cells, cytotoxic T cells, B cells, and monocytes — within just two hours [15]. The effect was selective and transient, suggesting support for immune surveillance rather than aggressive stimulation.* 

Compounds in AFA, such as sulfated polysaccharides, are known to interact with receptors involved in immune cell adhesion and trafficking, and may contribute to this modulation through a gut-to-brain-to-lymphoid signaling pathway.*

Through their combined actions — antioxidant, neuroprotective, and immunomodulatory — AFA’s constituents create the kind of internal balance that makes it easier for repair signals to register, and for the body to act on them when it counts.*

And it’s from this foundation that the body’s most powerful regenerative forces may begin to unfold.

Can Blue-Green Algae Support Stem Cell Activation?

The story of AFA and stem cells didn’t begin with regeneration. It began with the immune system.

Scientists noticed that compounds in AFA interacted with L-selectin, a molecule that helps immune cells navigate the body, and also plays a role in how stem cells are positioned within the bone marrow [16].* This overlap sparked a question: if AFA could influence L-selectin, might it also affect the balance between stem cell retention and release?

To find out, researchers conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in 12 healthy adults. Participants consumed either a placebo or an extract of AFA, then had their blood drawn over the course of two hours [17].

Using flow cytometry — a method that tags cells with fluorescent markers and counts them in real time — scientists measured levels of CD34⁺ and CD133⁺ cells, two markers commonly used to identify stem and progenitor cells involved in repair and regeneration.

Sure enough, within one hour of consuming the AFA extract, participants showed a statistically significant increase in circulating hematopoietic CD34⁺ cells — averaging 18% across all participants, and 25% after excluding a few noncompliant outliers. The effect was transient, but reproducible.*

So how does AFA trigger this response? The answer lies in the molecular signals that control when stem cells stay put, and when they’re set free.

How It Works: Untethering Stem Cells

Stem cells don’t typically roam the bloodstream in appreciable numbers. Hematopoietic stem cells reside in the bone marrow, anchored in place by molecular signals that act like a biochemical “stay here” command.

One of the most important of these signals is SDF-1, a chemical messenger produced by the bone marrow niche. Hematopoietic stem cells have a receptor called CXCR4 that detects SDF-1, and when the two connect, the message is clear: don’t leave. The stronger that signal, the more firmly stem cells stay put [18].

But when the body is under stress, it needs those cells elsewhere. That’s when it initiates mobilization, the process by which stem cells release their grip and enter circulation to assist with repair.

And that’s where AFA comes in.

In lab studies, researchers discovered that an extract of AFA contains a novel compound that binds to L-selectin [17]. This molecule acts like a mobility controller — helping cells interpret environmental cues about when to stay, when to move, and where to go. When the AFA-derived compound engaged L-selectin, it triggered a cascade that reduced the expression of CXCR4 on the surface of stem cells. With fewer CXCR4 receptors, the cells became less sensitive to the “stay here” signal from SDF-1, making them more likely to enter the bloodstream.*

It's worth noting that not every signal that binds L-selectin leads to the same outcome [19]. This isn’t a simple on/off switch—it’s more like a sensitive dial, where the effect depends on the nuance of the input. Some compounds turn the dial up, reinforcing the anchors that keep stem cells grounded. Others don't move the needle at all.

This is key to what sets AFA apart. Its signal lands with just the right touch, shifting the setting just enough for stem cells to loosen their grip on the bone marrow niche.*

Mobilization and Regenerative Readiness

Stem cells are always on call. But whether they respond to that call depends on the system’s readiness.

In a youthful system, stem cells can be deployed quickly in response to stress. But this efficiency tends to decline with age, and under certain forms of physiological strain [20].

Animal research offers a glimpse into what happens when this system falters. Older mice show significantly reduced stem cell mobilization following stress, compared to their younger counterparts [21]. Fewer regenerative cells enter circulation, and the response is slower — possibly contributing to the longer recovery times often observed with age.

This slowdown may be due to a loss of sensitivity. Stem cells that no longer hear the cues, or a cellular environment too burdened by chronic stress to respond efficiently. Inflammation, oxidative damage, and age-related changes in the stem cell niche may all contribute to the growing regenerative inertia.

That’s why scientists are increasingly exploring how to restore this mobilization process — not to wholly override the system, but to keep it nimble.

The Regenerative Potential of AFA: More Than the Sum of Its Parts

Aphanizomenon flos-aquae (AFA) is more than a green superfood. It's a wild, stress-adapted organism whose chemistry reflects the extremes that it survives. Over millennia, AFA developed a protective biochemistry shaped by challenge.

When we consume AFA, we inherit those same strategies. Its bioactive compounds work together synergistically to help the body defend against oxidative stress, sustain focus and resilience, and modulate immune activity without overstimulation.*

And from this web of support, something truly rare emerges. In early human research, AFA has been shown to temporarily increase circulating stem cells, supporting the body’s ability to mobilize its most fundamental agents of renewal.*

For those exploring the next generation of stem cell supplements, this wild form of blue-green algae may represent a key piece of the regenerative puzzle.* Shop Qualia Stem Cell now and revive your body's repair crew. Learn more about stem cell ingredients.

*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. The products and information on this website are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. The information on this site is for educational purposes only and should not be considered medical advice.

References

[1] Y. Zahra, D.H. Choo, H. Lee, A. Parveen, Environ. Sci. Eur. 7 (2020) 13.
[2] G.D. Scoglio, H.O. Jackson, S. Purton, J. Appl. Phycol. 36 (2024) 1593.
[3] A. De Porcellinis, N.U. Frigaard, Y. Sakuragi, J. Vis. Exp. 125 (2017) 56068.
[4] B. Rasmussen, I.R. Fletcher, J.J. Brocks, M.R. Kilburn, Nature 455 (2008) 1101.
[5] R.A. Soni, K. Sudhakar, R.S. Rana, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 69 (2017) 157.
[6] W.W. Carmichael, C. Drapeau, D.M. Anderson, J. Appl. Phycol. 12 (2000) 585.
[7] H.I. Essaid, J.S. Kuwabara, N.T. Corson-Dosch, J.L. Carter, B.R. Topping, Sci. Total Environ. 765 (2021) 142768.
[8] X. Wu, G.R. Beecher, J.M. Holden, D.B. Haytowitz, S.E. Gebhardt, R.L. Prior, J. Agric. Food Chem. 54 (2006) 4069.
[9] D.K. Saini, S. Pabbi, P. Shukla, Food Chem. Toxicol. 120 (2018) 616.
[10] S. Benedetti, S. Rinalducci, F. Benvenuti, S. Francogli, S. Pagliarani, L. Giorgi, M. Micheloni, G.M. D’Amici, L. Zolla, F. Canestrari, J. Chromatogr. B 833 (2006) 12.
[11] S. Scoglio, Y. Benedetti, F. Benvenuti, S. Battistelli, F. Canestrari, S. Benedetti, Phytomedicine 21 (2014) 992.
[12] M. Irsfeld, M. Spadafore, B.M. Prüß, Webmedcentral 4 (2013) 4409.
[13] A. Szabo, E. Billett, J. Turner, Br. J. Sports Med. 35 (2001) 342.
[14] L. Huang, M. Shen, G.A. Morris, J. Xie, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 92 (2019) 1.
[15] G.S. Jensen, D.I. Ginsberg, P. Huerta, M. Citton, C. Drapeau, J. Am. Nutraceut. Assoc. 2 (2000) 50.
[16] A. Ivetic, H.L. Hoskins Green, S.J. Hart, Front. Immunol. 10 (2019) 1068.
[17] G.S. Jensen, A.N. Hart, L.A.M. Zaske, C. Drapeau, N. Gupta, D.J. Schaeffer, J.A. Cruickshank, Cardiovasc. Revasc. Med. 8 (2007) 189.
[18] Y. Vagima, K. Lapid, O. Kollet, P. Goichberg, R. Alon, T. Lapidot, Methods Mol. Biol. 750 (2011) 277.
[19] Z. Ding, T.B. Issekutz, G.P. Downey, T.K. Waddell, Blood 101 (2003) 4245.
[20] T.A. Rando, A. Brunet, M.A. Goodell, Cell Stem Cell 32 (2025) 1038.
[21] X. Zhang, K. Sarkar, S. Rey, R. Sebastian, E. Andrikopoulou, G.P. Marti, K. Fox-Talbot, G.L. Semenza, J.W. Harmon, J. Mol. Med. 89 (2011) 985.