Best Protein Powder for Women: A Buyer's Guide

Best Protein Powder for Women: A Buyer's Guide

The best protein powder for women is way more than just protein. It's a stack.

Protein is the foundation. And research shows that it shifts a lot of levers in your favor.*

  • Protein supplementation combined with strength training builds on average 40-50% more muscle than training alone [1].

  • Higher protein intake spontaneously reduced daily calorie intake by ~440 calories and drove ~11 pounds of weight loss over 12 weeks [2].

  • A small serving of protein powder before eating reduced post-meal blood sugar exposure by 18% [3].

  • Protein supplementation boosted aerobic fitness gains by 26% and shaved ~29 seconds off time trial performance [4].

As a first layer, protein pulls a ton of weight.

But protein mainly feeds the muscle fibers doing the work. It addresses one slice of the musculoskeletal picture. 

Not the connective tissue that anchors them, not the bone that holds them up, nor the gut microbiome that interacts with them.

Those roles call for different tools. That’s where creatine, collagen, and prebiotic fiber enter the picture.*

In this guide, we’ll go beyond the benefits of protein powder to examine the research behind each layer, and build an evidence-based blueprint for the best protein powder for women.

Protein for Women Key Takeaways

  • The best protein powder for women starts with a complete, highly digestible protein. A PDCAAS of 1.0 indicates that a protein meets EAA requirements after digestibility is taken into account.*

  • Creatine increases muscle and strength in women, especially when combined with resistance training. Women tend to have lower creatine stores and consume less creatine than men — 3 grams per day is enough to gradually build muscle creatine stores.*

  • Collagen complements complete protein rather than replacing it. Complete protein powder provides the amino acids needed to build muscle, while collagen peptides supply bioactive peptides that support skin, connective tissue, and bone.*

  • Prebiotic fiber supports muscle through the gut–muscle axis. Gut bacteria ferment prebiotic fiber into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that enter circulation and signal to muscle.*

What Should Women Look for in a Protein Powder?

Women should look for a protein powder built around a complete, highly digestible protein that supplies all nine essential amino acids. From there, adding creatine, hydrolyzed collagen peptides, and prebiotic fiber extends those benefits to muscle energy, connective tissue, bone, and the gut–muscle axis.*

Not all grams of protein are created equal.

Muscle is built from amino acids, but nine of them are non-negotiable. Your body can't make the nine essential amino acids (EAAs) on its own, so every one of them has to come through your diet.

And muscle is really picky about this.

In human experiments, flooding the bloodstream with individual essential amino acids nearly doubled muscle protein synthesis. Meanwhile, large doses of nonessential amino acids did essentially nothing [5].

So you don't just want a lot of amino acids. You need the right ones.

The first thing to look for in a protein powder is a complete protein that supplies the full complement. You also need to account for how these amino acids are supplied and broken down. A complete protein powder isn't much good if your body can't absorb most of it.

Luckily, you don't have to dig into an amino acid table to figure this out.

PDCAAS (Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score) grades a protein based on its essential amino acid profile and its digestibility. A score of 1.0 (the max) means the protein meets the reference requirement for every essential amino acid after digestibility is taken into account [6].

Yet muscle does not work alone.*

Muscle regenerates ATP via phosphocreatine. Connective tissue transmits that force to bone. And the whole system is constantly responding to signals in your blood — including metabolites made by gut bacteria.*

Protein supplies the amino acids to rebuild muscle. Creatine, collagen, and prebiotic fiber plug into different parts of that same system.*

Ingredient

What it adds

What to look for

Complete protein

Essential amino acids that drive muscle protein synthesis*

All 9 EAAs; PDCAAS 1.0

Creatine

Supports phosphocreatine availability for rapid ATP regeneration during hard muscular work*

Creatine monohydrate

Collagen

Bioactive peptides that support connective tissue and bone remodeling*

Hydrolyzed collagen peptides (rather than gelatin or unhydrolyzed collagen)

Prebiotic fiber

Feeds gut bacteria that produce short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and modulate the gut-muscle axis*

Low-FODMAP, fermentable fibers (like partially hydrolyzed guar gum, acacia, or resistant dextrin)

Does Creatine Affect Women Differently Than Men?

Yes. Women have lower creatine stores and consume less creatine than men, while hormonal changes across the menstrual cycle and menopause also influence creatine metabolism. However, women respond well to creatine supplementation, and 3 grams per day is enough to gradually build muscle creatine stores.*

Why Is Creatine Especially Important for Women?

Women have more room to benefit from creatine supplementation because they start out with a smaller creatine pool than men.

Women wind up storing 70–80% as much creatine as men, while consuming 35–40% less creatine from food.

And that smaller baseline sits on a more hormonally dynamic foundation.

How Do Hormones Affect Creatine in Women?

Estrogen and progesterone influence the enzymes and transporters that manufacture creatine and shuttle it into cells. As a result, creatine metabolism shifts across the menstrual cycle as well as during menopause.

When estrogen dominates, creatine metabolism gets a jumpstart. Estrogen ramps up the enzymes that make creatine and strengthens the main creatine transporters. 

Then, when progesterone takes over in the second half of the menstrual cycle, all of those levers downshift [8]. The whole energy relay gets more inefficient. Which might be one reason why workouts infamously suck in the luteal phase. 

Later in life, when estrogen is chronically reduced, this down-tuned state is more or less entrenched.

This is where creatine is beneficial for women in particular — it keeps the creatine system stocked when your own production and transport are being dialed down [9].*


A.E. Smith-Ryan, H.E. Cabre, J.M. Eckerson, D.G. Candow, Nutrients 13 (2021) 877. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. 


How Does Creatine Affect Muscle and Strength in Women?

Creatine can substantially increase strength and lean mass in women. Research shows that the effects are strongest when creatine is combined with resistance training.*

Just one week of creatine can move the needle.

Thirty women (age 58–71) were randomized to creatine or placebo. After seven days, the creatine group was already pressing almost 12 pounds more on leg press and close to 4 pounds more on bench press than before. Placebo group had zero gains over the same window [10].

Stick with it, and the advantage really compounds.

A 10-week trial found that women taking creatine gained 60% more lean mass and 20-25% more strength on their lifts compared to women doing the same training with placebo [11].

Zooming out across randomized trials in women, creatine has consistently been shown to increase both lean mass and strength — if you’re doing the work. A meta-analysis found that creatine improved strength and lean mass in women when paired with resistance training, but not without it [12].

How Much Creatine Should a Woman Take Per Day?

Three grams of creatine monohydrate per day is enough to gradually saturate muscle creatine stores.

A lot of classic creatine studies used big “loading doses” to fill up muscle stores fast. This goes back to a seminal trial that compared different dosing protocols and found that 20 grams per day increased muscle creatine by 20% [13]. 

The downside is that these loading doses are often accompanied by GI fallout (bloating, cramping, you get the idea), as well as noticeable water retention. Not exactly a selling point for most women.

What most people missed from that same study is the low‑dose arm. Three grams of creatine per day also increased muscle creatine by 20%. It just took 28 days to get there.

And a head-to-head trial found that taking 3 g/day produced the same strength gains as the more popular 5 g/day [14].

So 3 grams per day of creatine monohydrate is a logical sweet spot for most women: enough to saturate your muscles and then keep them topped off, while avoiding digestive chaos or undue puffiness that can come with aggressive loading.

Should Collagen Be in Your Protein Powder?

Yes. Collagen is a useful addition to a protein powder because it supports collagen-rich tissues like skin, bone, and connective tissue, while complete protein provides the essential amino acids needed to build muscle. Collagen should complement, not replace, a complete protein powder. Research suggests that about 5 grams of collagen alongside 20–25 grams of complete protein can provide both in one formula.*

What Does Collagen Do for Skin?

Collagen provides the structural framework of your skin, accounting for ~75–80% of the dermis by dry weight [15].

As we get older, that scaffolding thins out. Dermal collagen declines by about 1% per year after your 20s and 30s [16]. That gradual erosion is essentially what visible skin aging is.

A big chunk of this problem is tied to fibroblasts, the workhorse cells in the dermis that remodel collagen. 

In aging skin, fibroblasts churn out ~32% less procollagen (the precursor form of collagen that gets processed into mature fibers) [17]. At the same time, they secrete more matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), the enzymes that break down existing collagen [18].

So production is down and degradation is up. As a result, skin is thinner, drier, less elastic, and more wrinkled.

Do Collagen Supplements Actually Improve Skin?

Yes, collagen for skin is more than just hype. A meta-analysis of 26 randomized trials in over 1,400 participants found that oral collagen peptides produced significant improvements in skin hydration and elasticity [19].*

And it doesn’t take much.

In one trial, just 2.5 grams per day of specific collagen peptides for 8 weeks increased procollagen I by 65% and elastin by 18%, measured via suction blister skin biopsies [20]. Literally more collagen and elastic fibers being laid down in the dermis, which is very much what we want.

Another study, using the same 2.5‑gram dose, reported a 46% reduction in wrinkle volume and a 34% increase in skin moisturization after 6 weeks compared with placebo [21].

How Do Collagen Peptides Work?

Collagen peptides appear to work as repair signals, rather than providing building blocks.

It’s easy to imagine that the collagen you eat goes straight to your skin and connective tissue and gets physically patched in. Sort of like laying down fresh bricks.

This mental model, while intuitive, is probably not right.

Here's how we think it actually works.

During digestion, collagen is broken down into constituent amino acids. But not completely. Some fragments survive intact as small di- and tripeptide fragments, like Gly‑Pro‑Hyp, and make it into the bloodstream intact [22].

These collagen peptides reach peripheral tissues (like your skin) looking an awful lot like damage debris. To a fibroblast, those floating fragments of collagen read as a sign of tissue damage [23].

The fibroblasts respond by building new collagen and elastin as well as ramping up hyaluronic acid production. So instead of acting like building blocks, collagen peptides are acting as a repair signal.*

And this goes beyond just your skin.

Can Collagen Improve Bone Health?

Yes, collagen peptides support bone formation through the same signaling mechanism as in skin, in similarly small doses (5 grams of collagen peptides per day).*

Bone is living tissue that is constantly being remodeled. Osteoclasts (bone-resorbing cells) break down old bone, while osteoblasts (bone building cells) lay down new matrix.

With age, osteoclast activity speeds up and osteoblast activity slows down, so more bone is being broken down than replaced [24]. Obviously not ideal.

The same di- and tripeptides that reach dermal fibroblasts also reach osteoblasts and osteoclasts through the bloodstream. And the message received is similar, because the bone matrix is largely collagen. Around 90% of bone's organic matrix is Type I collagen, the same type that predominates in the dermis [25].

In response to these collagen fragment signals, osteoblasts ramp up differentiation and mineralization. Osteoclasts, meanwhile, are dialed down [26]. The net result is more building and less breakdown.*

And we're starting to see this play out in randomized controlled trials.

German researchers put this to the test in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 131 postmenopausal women [27].

Participants took either 5 grams per day of specific collagen peptides or placebo.

After 12 months, lumbar spine BMD increased by about 3% in the collagen group and declined by ~1.3% in the placebo group. Meanwhile, femoral neck BMD increased 6.7% with collagen and fell ~1.0% with placebo.

Notably, P1NP, a marker of new type-I collagen formation, rose about 12%, which is exactly what you would predict from the peptide signaling mechanism we just walked through.

When researchers followed a subset of these women for four years, the gains really stacked up [28].

Women who kept taking 5 grams of collagen peptides daily saw spine BMD increase by 5.8–8.2% over that period.

For context, postmenopausal women typically lose ~1% BMD per year [29]. A 5–8% increase over 4 years in a population that might normally have lost 4% is a big deal!

Can Collagen Replace a Complete Protein?

Collagen is not featured in protein powders often. Mainly because it's got a truly lousy amino acid profile for muscle protein synthesis.

Collagen is very low in leucine, the key amino acid for flipping on the muscle‑building switch. Actually, it's low in essential amino acids in general. Gram-for-gram, collagen provides only ~36% as many EAAs and ~21% as much leucine as whey [30].

If you rely on it for muscle-building, you're going to have a bad time. And yes, that has been tested [30].

However, that peculiar amino acid profile — deeply enriched in glycine and proline — is precisely what makes it great for connective tissue [31].*

Instead of replacing a complete protein, the smart move is to layer collagen on top of one. Some researchers are now using protocols built around a large dose of a complete protein powder plus a small dose of collagen to support both muscle and its connective framework [32].

In one trial, a combination of 25 grams of whey and 5 grams of collagen increased myofibrillar protein synthesis by 23% and muscle connective protein synthesis by 22% at rest [33].

That combo gives you the best of both worlds: a complete protein powder to drive muscle, and collagen peptides to feed the scaffolding that holds it all together.*

Should a Protein Powder Contain Fiber?

Yes. A protein powder can benefit from prebiotic fiber because it complements protein via the gut-muscle axis. Prebiotic fiber feeds beneficial gut bacteria that produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), metabolites that influence muscle metabolism, while also helping close the fiber gap.*

How much fiber do women need?

Women should get about 25 grams of fiber per day, according to the Institute of Medicine [34].

Most women aren't even in the ballpark.

Research shows that a whopping 95% of American women fall short of that target [35].

The median intake is just ~14 grams, meaning that they would need to basically double their fiber intake just to hit the minimum [36].

So most of us could benefit from additional fiber. But that doesn’t mean you should fibermaxx indiscriminately. Fiber is just as diverse as protein [37].

How Does Prebiotic Fiber Support Muscle?

Prebiotic fiber feeds gut bacteria that produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), signaling molecules that influence muscle metabolism through the gut-muscle axis.

A lot of fibers just pass through mostly intact. But some are fermentable, meaning they get broken down by gut bacteria in the colon. Specifically, prebiotic fibers are selectively fermented by beneficial gut bacteria like Bifidobacteria, which are consistently associated with metabolic health [38].

Most of these downstream benefits come from short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) generated by these microbes during fermentation. These metabolites fuel the cells that line the colon, and reinforce the tight junctions that keep the gut barrier intact [39, 40].

But SCFAs are not confined to the gut. They enter the bloodstream and act as signaling molecules on tissues throughout the body — including muscle [41].*

This bidirectional interaction is known as the gut-muscle axis, and it might explain some of the more counterintuitive relationships we see for fiber in observational research.

For instance, in an analysis of nationally representative data from over 6,000 US adults aged 40 or older, higher dietary fiber intake was associated with more lean muscle mass [42].

And experiments suggest that SCFAs may be driving the bus here.

After 12 weeks of prebiotic fiber supplementation, older adults improved grip strength by 29%. That was accompanied by an increase in Bifidobacterium, an SCFA-boosting genus that was positively linked with muscle mass and grip strength across participants [43].

When SCFAs reach your muscles, they activate the mTOR pathway — the same anabolic switch triggered by protein [44]. At the same time, they support the mitochondrial machinery that creatine's energy system depends on [45].*

In other words, prebiotic fiber is operating on the same biology as creatine and protein, from a complementary upstream angle.*

How SCFAs act on skeletal muscle

What SCFAs do

Pathway

Why it matters for muscle

Activate anabolic signaling*

mTOR / S6K1

Increases muscle protein synthesis*

Suppress atrophy signaling*

FoxO3a / Atrogin-1

Reduces muscle protein breakdown*

Promote mitochondrial biogenesis*

AMPK / PGC-1α

Increases muscle energy capacity*

Insulin / GLUT4

Increase glucose uptake*

Improves muscle fuel availability*

What Type of Fiber Should a Protein Powder Contain?

Look for a slow-fermenting prebiotic fiber that produces SCFAs without causing excessive GI distress.

Prebiotics have a treacherous reputation, and it’s not entirely undeserved. 

Some fermentable fibers — most infamously inulin — come with fairly miserable side effects. Inulin ferments fast and mostly in the proximal colon, which means you get a concentrated burst of gas production in one small stretch of gut [46]. 

To avoid that, you want slow‑fermenting fibers, like acacia or partially hydrolyzed guar gum (PHGG). They spread fermentation out over a longer colonic transit, so your gut has time to cope with it without staging a revolt.

For example, 10 grams of acacia fiber was shown to produce far fewer GI side effects than the same dose of inulin. Meanwhile, it actually produced significantly greater increases in SCFA-boosting Bifidobacteria [47].

Our Pick for the Best Protein Powder for Women

We’re obviously a little biased here, but our pick for the best protein powder for women is Qualia All‑in‑One Protein, because it unites all four components together in a single formula.

The indispensable substrate is YESTEIN® fermented yeast protein, a complete fermented yeast protein with all nine essential amino acids and a PDCAAS of 1.0.

Every scoop is further bolstered with 3 grams of micronized creatine monohydrate — enough to load and maintain your intracellular energy reserves.*

On top of that, you get 5 grams of hydrolyzed collagen peptides, which reach into the structural matrix and provide the repair signal connective tissue and bone need to rebuild.*

Finally, 3 grams of FiberEssence® prebiotic fiber provides fermentable substrates for the gut bacteria, generating SCFAs that modulate muscle remotely.*

It’s a one‑scoop stack for muscle protein synthesis, the phosphocreatine system, skin and connective tissue integrity, and the gut–muscle axis.*

Component

The benchmark

What Qualia All-in-One provides

Protein 

Complete protein powder with all 9 EAAs; PDCAAS 1.0

YESTEIN® fermented yeast protein: all 9 EAAs; PDCAAS 1.0

Creatine

3 g creatine monohydrate

3 g OptiCreatine™ creatine monohydrate

Collagen

~5 g hydrolyzed collagen peptides 

5 g grass-fed bovine Type I & III collagen peptides

Prebiotic fiber

Low-FODMAP fermentable fibers

3 g FiberEssence®: resistant dextrin + PHGG + acacia


*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.  This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

References

[1] E.A. Nunes, L. Colenso-Semple, S.R. McKellar, T. Yau, M.U. Ali, D. Fitzpatrick-Lewis, D. Sherifali, C. Gaudichon, D. Tomé, P.J. Atherton, M.C. Robles, S. Naranjo-Modad, M. Braun, F. Landi, S.M. Phillips, J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 13 (2022) 795–810.

[2] D.S. Weigle, P.A. Breen, C.C. Matthys, H.S. Callahan, K.E. Meeuws, V.R. Burden, J.Q. Purnell, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 82 (2005) 41–48.

[3] T. Akhavan, B.L. Luhovyy, P.H. Brown, C.E. Cho, G.H. Anderson, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 91 (2010) 966–975.

[4] P. Knuiman, L.J.C. van Loon, J. Wouters, M. Hopman, M. Mensink, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 110 (2019) 508–518.

[5] K. Smith, N. Reynolds, S. Downie, A. Patel, M.J. Rennie, Am. J. Physiol. 275 (1998) E73–E78.

[6] G. Schaafsma, J Nutr 130 (2000) 1865S–1867S.

[7] A.E. Smith-Ryan, H.E. Cabre, J.M. Eckerson, D.G. Candow, Nutrients 13 (2021) 877.

[8] A.E. Smith-Ryan, G.M. DelBiondo, A.F. Brown, S.M. Kleiner, N.T. Tran, S.J. Ellery, J Int Soc Sports Nutr 22 (2025) 2502094.

[9] A.N. Gordon, S.R. Moore, N.D. Patterson, M.E. Hostetter, H.E. Cabre, K.R. Hirsch, A.C. Hackney, A.E. Smith-Ryan, Nutrients 15 (2023) 3567.

[10] L.A. Gotshalk, W.J. Kraemer, M.A.G. Mendonca, J.L. Vingren, A.M. Kenny, B.A. Spiering, D.L. Hatfield, M.S. Fragala, J.S. Volek, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 102 (2008) 223–231.

[11] K. Vandenberghe, M. Goris, P. Van Hecke, M. Van Leemputte, L. Vangerven, P. Hespel, J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 83 (1997) 2055–2063.

[12] S. Naddafha, J. Antonio, R.B. Kreider, J.R. Stout, J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 23 (2026) 2668435.

[13] E. Hultman, K. Söderlund, J.A. Timmons, G. Cederblad, P.L. Greenhaff, J Appl Physiol (1985) 81 (1996) 232–237.

[14] J.D.O. Vilar Neto, C.A. da Silva, A.B. Lima, F.J. Rosa de Souza, D.V. Pinto, Asian J. Sports Med. 9 (2018) e62739.

[15] J. Uitto, N Engl J Med 337 (1997) 1463–1465.

[16] S. Shuster, M.M. Black, E. McVitie, Br. J. Dermatol. 93 (1975) 639–643.

[17] J. Varani, M.K. Dame, L. Rittie, S.E. Fligiel, S. Kang, G.J. Fisher, J.J. Voorhees, Am. J. Pathol. 168 (2006) 1861–1868.

[18] G.J. Fisher, T. Quan, T. Purohit, Y. Shao, M.K. Cho, T. He, J. Varani, S. Kang, J.J. Voorhees, Am. J. Pathol. 174 (2009) 101–114.

[19] S.Y. Pu, Y.L. Huang, C.M. Pu, Y.N. Kang, K.D. Hoang, K.H. Chen, C. Chen, Nutrients 15 (2023) 2080.

[20] E. Proksch, M. Schunck, V. Zague, D. Segger, J. Degwert, S. Oesser, Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 27 (2014) 113–119.

[21] J.A. Carrillo-Norte, B. García-Mir, L. Quintana, B. Buracchio, R. Guerrero-Bonmatty, Cosmetics 11 (2024) 137.

[22] K. Iwai, T. Hasegawa, Y. Taguchi, F. Morimatsu, K. Sato, Y. Nakamura, A. Higashi, Y. Kido, Y. Nakabo, K. Ohtsuki, J. Agric. Food Chem. 53 (2005) 6531–6536.

[23] M. Yazaki, Y. Ito, M. Yamada, S. Goulas, S. Teramoto, M.A. Nakaya, S. Ohno, K. Yamaguchi, J. Agric. Food Chem. 65 (2017) 2315–2322.

[24] S.C. Manolagas, Endocr. Rev. 31 (2010) 266–300.

[25] S. Viguet-Carrin, P. Garnero, P.D. Delmas, Osteoporos Int 17 (2006) 319–336.

[26] F. Guillerminet, H. Beaupied, V. Fabien-Soulé, D. Tomé, C.L. Benhamou, C. Roux, A. Blais, Bone 46 (2010) 827–834.

[27] D. König, S. Oesser, S. Scharla, D. Zdzieblik, A. Gollhofer, Nutrients 10 (2018) 97.

[28] D. Zdzieblik, S. Oesser, D. König, J. Bone Metab. 28 (2021) 207–213.

[29] C. Berger, L. Langsetmo, L. Joseph, D.A. Hanley, K.S. Davison, R. Josse, N. Kreiger, A. Tenenhouse, D. Goltzman, CMAJ 178 (2008) 1660–1668.

[30] S.Y. Oikawa, M.J. Kamal, E.K. Webb, C. McGlory, S.K. Baker, S.M. Phillips, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 111 (2020) 708–718.

[31] P. Li, G. Wu, Amino Acids 50 (2018) 29–38.

[32] T. Aussieker, T.A.H. Janssen, W.J.H. Hermans, A.M. Holwerda, J.M. Senden, J.M.X. van Kranenburg, J.P.B. Goessens, T. Snijders, L.J.C. van Loon, Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 34 (2024) 189–198.

[33] T. Aussieker, J. Kaiser, W.J.H. Hermans, F.K. Hendriks, A.M. Holwerda, J.M. Senden, J.M.X. van Kranenburg, J.P.B. Goessens, U. Braun, K. Baar, T. Snijders, L.J.C. van Loon, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 57 (2025) 544–554.

[34] Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005. doi:10.17226/10490.

[35] D. Quagliani, P. Felt-Gunderson, Am J Lifestyle Med 11 (2017) 80–85.

[36] Usual Nutrient Intake from Food and Beverages, by Gender and Age, What We Eat in America, NHANES 2015–2018 (USDA ARS, 2021), Table A6.

[37] N.M. McKeown, G.C. Fahey, J. Slavin, J.W. van der Kamp, BMJ 378 (2022) e054370.

[38] G.R. Gibson, R. Hutkins, M.E. Sanders, S.L. Prescott, R.A. Reimer, S.J. Salminen, K. Scott, C. Stanton, K.S. Swanson, P.D. Cani, K. Verbeke, G. Reid, Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14 (2017) 491–502.

[39] D.J. Morrison, T. Preston, Gut Microbes 7 (2016) 189–200.

[40] L. Peng, Z.R. Li, R.S. Green, I.R. Holzman, J. Lin, J. Nutr. 139 (2009) 1619–1625.

[41] J. Frampton, K.G. Murphy, G. Frost, E.S. Chambers, Nat. Metab. 2 (2020) 840–848.

[42] J. Frampton, K.G. Murphy, G. Frost, E.S. Chambers, J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 12 (2021) 2134–2144.

[43] J. Yang, L. Hou, A. Wang, L. Shang, X. Jia, R. Xu, X. Wang, J. Clin. Invest. 134 (2024) e176507.

[44] C. Liu, P.Y. Wong, Q. Wang, H.Y. Wong, T. Huang, C. Cui, N. Zhang, W.H. Cheung, R.M.Y. Wong, J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 15 (2024) 2387–2401.

[45] Z. Gao, J. Yin, J. Zhang, R.E. Ward, R.J. Martin, M. Lefevre, W.T. Cefalu, J. Ye, Diabetes 58 (2009) 1509–1517.

[46] D. So, C.K. Yao, P.A. Gill, P.A. Thwaites, Z.S. Ardalan, C.S. McSweeney, S.E. Denman, A.F. Chrimes, J.G. Muir, K.J. Berean, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, P.R. Gibson, Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 58 (2023) 417–428.

[47] W. Calame, A.R. Weseler, C. Viebke, C. Flynn, A.D. Siemensma, Br. J. Nutr. 100 (2008) 1269–1275.

Your Cart

Loading your cart

Your cart is empty

Continue Shopping
Subtotal
You're saving
Checkout View full cart page
100-Day Money-Back Guarantee
Cancel Anytime
Secure Checkout

Sign In